E-Cigarettes -- Are They Really Unsafe?

There is an interesting new invention that everyone who smokes should know about. It's called the electronic cigarette. It looks like a cigarette, tastes like a cigarette, and feels like a cigarette. The e-cigarette works by dissolving nicotine within a cartridge that contains the chemical propylene glycol, which is used to make the smoke in such things as fog machines used at parties. Other uses for this chemical include being put in bakery goods, prepared fruits and vegetables, food coloring, flavor concentrates, sunscreen, hand moisturizers, cosmetics, toothpaste, mouth wash, and even baby wipes.

While everyone claims that Electronic cigarettes is a safe alternate of cigarette but WHO has not sufficient evidence that e-cigarettes are a safe alternative of smoking, but where is the evidence supporting that they are not safe? The major chemicals within an e-cigarette are either already on the MHRA GRAS ("general recognized as safe") list or are already comprised in cigarettes themselves. There isn't anything in them more dangerous than the pack of normal cigarettes a person can get at their nearest convenience store and the most important chemical in them, nicotine, isn't listed by any health organization as a carcinogen.

It adopts the advanced microelectronic technology and supercritical physical atomized technology, to atomize the E-smoking Liquid. E-cigarettes really are slammed simply because of the chemicals they contain? Is it just a health issue? Considering the amount of chemicals contained in a normal cigarette versus an e-cigarette, shouldn't the MHRA be elated that there is such an alternative that both mimics the habit of smoking and reduces the amount of carcinogens the smoker and those around him are inhaling by 100%.